So, just out of curiosity. Are any of you letting the fact that the NY event is being put on to promote this new partnership with Eggland keep you from signing up for the free workouts?
To most vegans, the act of branding and selling eggs (which Egglands Best indisputably does), no matter how happy the chickens are, no matter how clean and healthy the eggs are, is an unacceptable from of animal exploitation.
I'd also like to add that those "steps" taken to correct documented animal abuse are often half hearted and not enforced.
Debeaking doesn't actually make them beakless : debeaking means cutting off the end of the beak (which sometimes also cuts off part of the tongue). Imagine somebody sitting at a machine doing this as quickly as possible, and at the same time tossing the male chickens (who are worthless to the egg production) into a bag or directly into a grinder.BEAKLESS??? OMG, I had no idea
True, but what about this particular case? Half-hearted attempts by other companies doesn't equal a half-hearted attempt by one specific company. What are the facts here?
No. Cathe has never been accused of animal cruelty, by association or otherwise. In fact, I just spelled that out in a recent post just so people wouldn't jump to that conclusion.I mean, Cathe has been accused of animal cruelty by association.
Talking with others about a possible ethical dilemma. When it concerns Cathe and Eggland, where else would we have this conversation?I don't care if you eat eggs or not, but think about what you're doing here in this thread.
I'm not.You shouldn't ask her to make career decisions based upon your beliefs.
Right. Same with me, which is why I'm discussing this latest business venture with others who are concerned about a very public association with an egg producer that in the past has been connected with a farm that abuses animals. I'm working on a decision based on what's best for me, and part of that is talking it out with others and getting various opinions.I can only make decisions about what is best for me.
I can only make decisions about what is best for me.
I agree. This is an animal welfare issue, not solely a vegan issue. It's not an 'us against them' (vegan vs. non-vegans) topic, but an "us for them" (all those concerned with animal welfare and humane treatment of animals supporting those animals who are used in the food production industry to have a better life).No offense to the OP, but I wish we had brought up this issue without such a focus on veganism, which most people dismiss as a fringe minority.
Thank you. I know what veganism is. The post I responded to was talking about Chris's post and animal cruelty with regard to Eggland's Best. I was trying to clarify some of the things he said and Google said.
That was in response to your remark "they aren't aligned with cruelty". I assumed that you meant Eggland's Best - I apologize if I misread your post. I am not accusing Cathe of animal cruelty - I don't think anyone is - but the partnership with an egg company is going to be problematic for many veggies out there.
True, but what about this particular case? Half-hearted attempts by other companies doesn't equal a half-hearted attempt by one specific company. What are the facts here? I mean, Cathe has been accused of animal cruelty by association. Not directly, but it has certainly been implied. So, what are the facts? Actual hard evidence not assumptions.
In 2007, Eggland's Best received certification from the Humane Association for their humane standards. A couple months ago, Mercy for Animals investigated several egg farms and uncovered highly disturbing conditions that were by no means "humane".
Even the humane standards are insufficient, although this is just my opinion. California's relatively progressive Prop 2 would require:
egg-laying factory farms to confine animals humanely, with space enough to allow them to "lie down, stand up, fully extend their limbs and turn around freely."
And most states don't even have laws that stringent. And Prop 2 won't even go into effect until 2015, and it is predicted that even allowing animals to turn around in their cages will be too expensive:
That first-in-the-nation law is set to take effect in 2015, and is predicted to increase egg production costs by as much as 20 percent, according to a University of California study. The change could push large farmers out of the nation's largest agricultural state, one of the top egg-producing states in the nation, the study found.
So now, and for the next six years, chickens WON'T enjoy those "privileges". EB says they have their consumers in mind and are trying to implement reforms, but they were supposed to be doing that before, and they clearly didn't monitor their egg producers at all.
But all of this is irrelevant: I know that you say you understand what veganism is, but you seem to be missing the point that from a vegan standpoint, using chickens for eggs, under any circumstances, IS the cruelty.
Even if EB had not bought eggs from places that got caught using especially horrible practices, the very fact that they sell eggs AT ALL is still a problem. For vegans. I know it's not everyone's problem and I certainly don't want to tell others what to do or what decisions to make. I'm not asking Cathe to make career decisions based on my personal ethics. The OP asked for our opinions as vegans - and that's mine.
Reading my post, I sound kind of harsh. I don't mean to be, LaughingWater. My a/c is broken and its HOT HOT HOT. It's that time of the month. I'm having a very bad day. Sorry for the harsh tone. I really don't mean it.
No need to apologize. ((hug)) I'm having a crappy day too, but this thread has been a nice distraction. Gives me something else to think about.Reading my post, I sound kind of harsh. I don't mean to be, LaughingWater. My a/c is broken and its HOT HOT HOT. It's that time of the month. I'm having a very bad day. Sorry for the harsh tone. I really don't mean it.