mini-natty
Cathlete
Xtrain features a User's Guide which addresses this issue. Here is a short quote taken from it:
"Men have known the benefits of heavy lifting for decades, but some woman shy away from lifting weights. When they do head over to the weight rack, they lift weights that aren't heavy enough to challenge their muscles. The reason? Some fear it will make them bulky and destroy their feminine shape".
I was curious as to who still believes this method of training "bulks" them up and therefor avoids moderate-heavy lifting? No judgement or criticism here on my part. Everyone is entitled to an honest opinion. I believe this is an interesting topic avail for discussion.
I can say from my own personal experience, lifting heavier, challenging weights has defined my physique with no "bulk". I appear leaner, toned, stronger, with nicely shaped muscles (which I work very hard to get!). I'm pear-shape, and in my quest to lean-out my lower-half, I've encountered a slew of articles/info as to whether lifting heavy for the lower body will increase (bulk) thigh size. I can positively say this is simply not accurate in my case. If anything, my thigh and glutes have decreased in size, leaving sculpted muscles in my quads and hamstrings. The proof is in the pudding as I've had to buy all new (smaller!) sized pants. I'm amazed at how pants that fit me 10 yrs ago are now loose in the thigh & butt area. What surprises me the most is that I practically weigh the same! Moderate-heavy weight lifting in addition with a healthy, clean, portion controlled, eating lifestyle (I don't use the word diet) has pretty much transformed my body. So thank you Cathe, for making me a firm believer in your heavy lifting philosophy.
Happy New Year everyone
Natasha
"Men have known the benefits of heavy lifting for decades, but some woman shy away from lifting weights. When they do head over to the weight rack, they lift weights that aren't heavy enough to challenge their muscles. The reason? Some fear it will make them bulky and destroy their feminine shape".
I was curious as to who still believes this method of training "bulks" them up and therefor avoids moderate-heavy lifting? No judgement or criticism here on my part. Everyone is entitled to an honest opinion. I believe this is an interesting topic avail for discussion.
I can say from my own personal experience, lifting heavier, challenging weights has defined my physique with no "bulk". I appear leaner, toned, stronger, with nicely shaped muscles (which I work very hard to get!). I'm pear-shape, and in my quest to lean-out my lower-half, I've encountered a slew of articles/info as to whether lifting heavy for the lower body will increase (bulk) thigh size. I can positively say this is simply not accurate in my case. If anything, my thigh and glutes have decreased in size, leaving sculpted muscles in my quads and hamstrings. The proof is in the pudding as I've had to buy all new (smaller!) sized pants. I'm amazed at how pants that fit me 10 yrs ago are now loose in the thigh & butt area. What surprises me the most is that I practically weigh the same! Moderate-heavy weight lifting in addition with a healthy, clean, portion controlled, eating lifestyle (I don't use the word diet) has pretty much transformed my body. So thank you Cathe, for making me a firm believer in your heavy lifting philosophy.
Happy New Year everyone
Natasha