>JLH didn't get famous for her acting, she got famous for
>showing off her big chest, and parading around half-naked in
>skimpy clothes. There wouldn't be this much media glee if this
>were Meryl Streep. When your body is all you're known for,
>you're going to have to expect this kind of attention. She is
>partly responsible for all the media glare because she drew
>everyone's attention to her body in the first place. Now, the
>comments are awful mean, but it's just like when some
>self-righteous politician gets caught with his pants down.
>People love the hypocrisy.
I guess I don't see the hypocrisy here on behalf of Jennifer Love Hewitt. She may have become famous for being beautiful, but from what I've heard she has said about this, she still thinks she is beautiful (and rightfully so, in my opinion). She's not changed or doing anything in contradiction to what she once did. Her concern is with how she's been assessed, not in how she is presenting herself.
Where I see the problem is in the media criticizing a beautiful woman for being fat and out of shape simply because they love to mock, not because that woman is fat or out of shape. She may not be a size two, but she definitely isn't morbidly obese or unhealthy in her proportions at all.
So I sit here amazed that anybody would think those photos of her should be presented in a negative light. She may have made her living beautiful, but frankly, if I looked like she did in those photos that are supposed to make her look bad, I'd show off my beauty too.
I will never excuse the media for making a story where there shouldn't be one, and that's what has happened here, in my opinion. This was a woman celebrating her engagement. If they wanted to present the photos, couldn't they have simply said that? Why the need to tear her down even if she has made a living out of her looks?
I guess the seeming need to unnecessarily insult people by the tabloid media in particular is a really sore subject to me.
c