Melody and all, I hate to rehash this topic several days later but I just saw it.
It reminds me of recently, the Vermont judge that gave a child molester only 60 days jail time for assaulting a child starting at age 6 and for about four more years. Reason was, the child molestor was considered, potentially, a "non-reoffender", so no "in-jail" treatment was allotted for him. So the judge thought the sentence was too tough.
After much backlash from some folks, including Bill O'Reilly, the judge did resentence him to 3-10 years punishment. BUT- only after that "conservative" outlash. I add that in, only because I personally, only saw reports of it on Bill O'Reilly as my DH watched it and not in my local "liberal" paper which I do suscribe to, nor the headlines on my broadband website.
I would think, that if the judge was as equally concerned with the treatment of this new "inmate" as with the child victim, then look into changes of the prison system. Revolutionize an incarceration system that was more humane & less barbaric. Don't leave him out free with more kids! Please! If you can't do a good job of monitoring your incarcerated inmates, why the heck would we trust you with ankle-braceleted child-molestors?!!!
For the record, I have had a few experiences of my own. I would never wish any hideous acts on anyone of them. But that's where my humanity ends. I'm not about to trust a single one of them with new unsuspecting, innocent children. These perverts need to be incarcerated. I've never met or heard of a rehabilitated child molester.