patchworkpenguin
Cathlete
My sister raves about Targets clothes, especially the workout wear, but I have to go UP 3 SIZES, and I'm already a pluss size! Now I wouldn't mind going DOWN 3 sizes, that's a different story!
Nanbo said:Another variable is "WHEN" you were trying on the clothes. Clothing nowadays is sized smaller than in the late 1980s. A size 6 back then would probably be a 2 now.
I have a pair of Levi jeans from 1989 that astound my co-workers. I can't fit into them to save my life now, but I saved them because they were such high quality denim and the style was so indicative of the times. When I wore them (at 28 years old!) I was 103 pounds at 5'5" tall. I had a 24 inch waist, 34 inch hips, 20 inch thighs with a 34" length. They were skin tight and rode just below my belly button. The label says "Size 6".
Fast forward to 2012: I'm 130 pounds with a 27 inch waist, 37 inch hips and 23 inch thighs. The tag on the Lees jeans I'm currently wearing says "Size 6". Go figure!
LOL Too funny!
J Crew is the worst for vanity sizing! I have to size down one or two sizes in everything. I love the clothing, but the vanity sizing is ridiculous!
It completely depends on your bone structure, your body type, your frame size, your height.... so many things.
I don't think you can decide that skinny is a certain size.
I am a size 0. I am slender, but I am far from scary skinny. Many people would be scary skinny at my size, but I have a very small bone structure and slender hips, etc. There are just so many factors to take into consideration other than the size someone wears.
So anyway, my point is, clothing sizes are such a variable there seems little point in focusing on them.
bonjonbart said:I really would be happy if womens sizes were sold in the same manner as mens.
Waist measurement, inseam, sleeve, chest, neck.
It would be so much easier to know what you were buying.
I really would be happy if womens sizes were sold in the same manner as mens.
Waist measurement, inseam, sleeve, chest, neck.
It would be so much easier to know what you were buying.
This is a great discussion. I have a 13 year old daughter. I want to set a good example for her. All of her friends talk about how skinny or fat (I hate these words) someone is. These words should not be used to described anyone. Yes, these words should banned. It gives the wrong message to our kids. I tell my daugher to start thinking in terms of being healthy and being fit. It's a battle sometimes. I set a good example for her by working out on regular basis. I show her muscles that I earned by doing Cathe's workouts too! There is a lot of noise out there (in my daugther's teenage world) that could be dangerous if not diverted.
I'm encourging her to join me on this Cathe journey.
Personally, I hate the word skinny and think it should be banned! I'd so much rather focus on being and looking healthy.
Lisa
And while we're banning words/.... let's get rid of that whole thing where women who are larger say "I have curves" (in a manner that insinuates that smaller women don't have curves). Well, ALL women have curves. Some curves are bigger than other curves, but I don't know too many women whose bodies aren't curved.
Some jeans are this way, but sizing is still not accurate.
You can take 2 of the same size in the fitting room and they will be cut different. I think it's because they cut stacks of cloth at one time.
I am not a bean pole but I'm not curvey either. Yeah, we all have curves but having curves and being curvey are 2 different things IMO. Curvey to me means hour glass figure and I'm not even close to that! I wish I was though!