Hi Cathe and cathletes!
I'm just wondering the science of calories burned. I believe that the definition of the word calorie is "a measurement of energy". So my question is.....don't we all burn calories at a different rate from each other? Surely a 6 ft male weighing 200 lbs would burn more calories than 5 ft 3in female because of the difference in muscle mass. You need muscles to work to generate heat and THATS what burns calories right? So when I do a workout that claims I'll burn say 500 calories......how can that be accurate?
I just got a Polar heart rate monitor and I've done 4 different workouts and have yet to come near the calories burned that I should have. One workout in particular I amped it up....using heavier weights, doing jacks while they were doing grapevines etc. Still not close. The heart rate monitor is fine and I know how to use it. I'm just wondering if I'm missing something in the science.
Thanks for all you do!
Peg
I'm just wondering the science of calories burned. I believe that the definition of the word calorie is "a measurement of energy". So my question is.....don't we all burn calories at a different rate from each other? Surely a 6 ft male weighing 200 lbs would burn more calories than 5 ft 3in female because of the difference in muscle mass. You need muscles to work to generate heat and THATS what burns calories right? So when I do a workout that claims I'll burn say 500 calories......how can that be accurate?
I just got a Polar heart rate monitor and I've done 4 different workouts and have yet to come near the calories burned that I should have. One workout in particular I amped it up....using heavier weights, doing jacks while they were doing grapevines etc. Still not close. The heart rate monitor is fine and I know how to use it. I'm just wondering if I'm missing something in the science.
Thanks for all you do!
Peg