>I am going be the voice of dissent here. Math is one of my
>strong suits - I'm an engineer. So I'll back up my claim with
>numbers:
>
>It should not matter where you are on the treadmill when it is
>inclined, assuming your stride length is constant. The
>incline is the same across the entire length of the belt -
>that is, if the incline is 10% (for simplicity's sake), the
>belt rises 1 inch for every 10 inches of length, regardless of
>where you are on the belt. So if your stride length is 30",
>no matter where you run on the length of that belt, you will
>still be raising your foot to accomodate a 3" rise. You may
>even be cheating yourself by running at the front/top of the
>belt, because it may cause you to shorten your stride length,
>which effectively reduces the rise you have to gain with each
>step.
>
>I realize it's hard to visualize without a diagram, so if my
>explanation is still unclear, I'd be happy to draw up a
>diagram and post it here. I'm just that geeky. Just know
>that you are getting the same workout on any portion of your
>treadmill IF you are maintaining a constant stride length.
>
Until I read your response I never really thought about it. Now that I have I totally get what you're saying. If you think about it, the entire belt is tilted at the same degree, regardless of where you choose to position yourself. Huh...