The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this out

icklemoley

Cathlete
The Institute of Medicine at the National Academy of Sciences has issued a new intake for healthy weight loss. This chart assumes that you walk 5 days per week for 30 mins. As you can see, the low calorie days are gone. This chart is Women only, Men need approx 500 calories more per day.

4’11” 92-124lb 2,127 – 2,399
5’1” 98-132lb 2,305 – 2,615
5’3” 104-141lb 2,397 – 2,727
5’5” 111-150lb 2,490 – 2,842
5’7” 118-159lb 2,586 - 2,959
5’9” 125-169lb 2,683 – 3,078
5’11” 132 – 178lb 2,782 – 3,200

The new research shows that weight loss, with a higher calorie diet will keep metabolism up, build lean muscle mass and allow weight loss of 1-2lb per week.

Hope you all like it.

Wayne Goss.:7
 
If this is true, I think we're all chonically undereating:7 !
I'm afraid I'd gain weight this this many calories everyday!! But I'd love to try;-) !


Aimee
 
I know that i'm a man, but i eat 3000, 3500 per day, i have 8% body fat. I didn't start out that way, it was 15% and i felt like crap. I increased my calorie intake, yes weight loss took longer, but as i built lean muscle, burnt fat it started to happen. I don't eat a special diet, i eat when hungry and drink when thirsty. Very sane. I eat meat, eggs, starch, chocolate, etc...but i never ever go over 3000 - 3500 per day. I try not to eat too much carbs in the evening as they stay on me and make me feel bloated. I need my energy for the day time.
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

Hey Wayne,

Like Amy, I'm afraid that if I ate that many calories I would blow up like a balloon. I would be interested in reading the entire article this came from. I'm really trying to get the nutritional side of fitness down & am reading everything I can get my hands on. I've been stuck at the same 150 for 2 years. At 5'6", it doesn't look bad until I put on a bathing suit. Sure would be nice to find that right caloric intake before bathing suit season. LOL

Do you have a link to the information?

TTIA
 
Holy Cow.I can't imagine eating 2800 cals a day! I have trouble even eating 1800.I think with 2800 you would be eating ALL day.Not that that sounds like a bad thing to me, but I highly doubt that they mean 1 seving of triple browine overload ice cream everyday.It would have to be 2800 cals of fruit,salads, and chicken.But why eat more then what your hungry for? Its like money,it's nice to know that it's there if you need it,but why use it if you don't want anything:)That probably wouldn't be a good example for me either b/c I love to spend money:7 O.k I will shut up now.....
Lori
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

There must be a mistake there. I am 5'7 and if I ate 2,500-2,950 calories a day I would GAIN weight and I work out 5 days a week. Maybe if I were az marathon runnuer I would lose on that but not just working out 45-60 inutes a day. And they are saying to eat this with a 30 minute walk??

If they are telling people to eat this to lose, and people believe it there will even more overweight people.

I'm curious what others think.

On the other hand, I'm glad to see the days of eating 1,000-1,200 calories a day for weight loss are gone. I think there needs to be a happy medium between the two!

Marci
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

Wow! That's a lot of food. Unfortunately I had the Medgem thing done this weekend (it measures your metabolic rate) and apparently mine is a dismal 920. So apparently even with my Cathe workouts I can only eat 1300 cals a day to maintain my weight! I remember how awful I used to feel when I used to eat that little to lose weight. But I've been told that Medgem is the most scientific way to calculate your calorie needs. I am totally baffled by science!
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

I think this is crazy-- at least for me. I have never been able to lose weight by eating more than 1800 calories (and I exercise a lot more than a 30 minute walk 5 days a week.) Now, I have to eat less than 1200 calories to lose weight.

There's so much conflicting information out there about calorie intake. On one hand, there's the "just cut one cookie a day" camp (but I don't eat cookies or junk every day, so what am I supposed to cut? Does that mean I should be eating 1100 calories instead of 1200?) On the other hand, there's the "chronic undereating lowers your metabolism and puts you in starvation mode" camp. On the third hand, there's the "there's no such thing as low metabolism and you should eat less, period" camp. So, since I'm fat, I should eat fewer cookies than the none I eat now, I should eat more to boost my metabolism, and I should eat less because I'm burning fewer calories than I eat.

Sigh.
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

The calories work for me!

I am 5ft10 and if I go under 2300 kcal I am starving. I average about 2800 kcal/day, if I want to lose a couple of pounds, I go down to 2300 kcal (yes, 2300 kcal is restrictive to me).

I work out 8 hours/week with Cathe - in case my activity level has something to do with it. I sometimes add on TaeBo, Spinning, Firm, FitPrime etc, which puts me at about 10 hours/week.
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

I think the chart posted at the beginning of this thread is for men, not women. Also, I think the calorie estimates are for maintaining weight, not losing weight.

Check out this page from: "Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients) (2002)" by the Institute of Medicine:

http://books.nap.edu/books/0309085373/html/150.html
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

WOW, i didn't realise when i posted that i would get such feedback. Ok, firstly this is a calorie chart for women! Not men! I got it from an English Publication, but i will find out the sorce and get back to you all on that, proimse.

I think that if you are doing aerobics, weight training and living your life (kids, husband, job etc...)then this calorie chart is accurate! I couldn't imagine living on 1,500 or 1,800 per day. I'd fade away. Yes when i increased my calories i gained a little weight, but mostly water i think. But i gained more muscle cause i now had food to feed the newly built muscle tissue.

Wayne.

:D
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

That is to funny.I am LMAO!!!!:7 :7 :7 :7 :7 What you just said summed up what I have been thinking for the last week.I am baffled to.
Do I eat more? Do I eat less? Do I eat 3 meals a day? Do I eat 6 meals a day? Do I eat before I go to bed? Should I feel hungry? Should I feel full???? What gives?
Lori
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

Deborah, if you're reading lots, you might find this book interesting: Food & Mood (The subtitle is something like Guide to Eating Well and Feeling Your Best) by Elizabeth Somer.
juliee
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

These counts really seem high, BUT, if you average it out by factoring in my cheat day calories (which I've never tallied, but know must be massive), I may well be way up there and not know it.

Six days a week I go 1600-1900, but if you figure in the cheat day, it may average out to 2500 or more.

That being said, these charts may not be outlandish at all.
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

This is really long folks, so be warned, but it's from the same place that is reccommending the new calorie consumption.... Wayne

Report Offers New Eating and Physical Activity Targets
To Reduce Chronic Disease Risk

WASHINGTON -- To meet the body's daily energy and nutritional needs while minimizing risk for chronic disease, adults should get 45 percent to 65 percent of their calories from carbohydrates, 20 percent to 35 percent from fat, and 10 percent to 35 percent from protein, says the newest report on recommendations for healthy eating from the National Academies' Institute of Medicine. To maintain cardiovascular health at a maximal level, regardless of weight, adults and children also should spend a total of at least one hour each day in moderately intense physical activity, which is double the daily minimum goal set by the 1996 Surgeon General's report.

Because carbohydrates, fat, and protein all serve as energy sources and can substitute for one another to some extent to meet caloric needs, the recommended ranges for consuming these nutrients should be useful and flexible for dietary planning. Earlier guidelines called for diets with 50 percent or more of carbohydrate and 30 percent or less of fat; protein intake recommendations are the same. The new acceptable ranges for children are similar to those for adults, except that infants and younger children need a slightly higher proportion of fat -- 25 percent to 40 percent of their caloric intake, said the panel that wrote the report.

"We established ranges for fat, carbohydrates, and protein because they must be considered together," said panel chair Joanne Lupton, professor of nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station. "Studies show that when people eat very low levels of fat combined with very high levels of carbohydrates, high-density lipoprotein concentration, or 'good' cholesterol, decreases. Conversely, high-fat diets can lead to obesity and its complications if caloric intake is increased as well, which is often the case. We believe these ranges will help people make healthy and more realistic choices based on their own food preferences."

The report stresses the importance of balancing diet with physical activity, recommending total calories to be consumed by individuals of given heights, weights, and genders for each of four different levels of physical activity. For example, a 30-year-old woman who is 5 feet 5 inches tall and weighs 111 to 150 pounds should consume between 1,800 and 2,000 calories daily if she lives a sedentary lifestyle. However, if she is a very active person, her recommended total caloric intake increases to 2,500 to 2,800 calories per day. If her lifestyle fits the moderately active category as defined in the report, which is the minimum level of activity to decrease risk of chronic disease, she should eat between 2,200 and 2,500 calories daily. Using grams for the recommended ranges of intake, she should consume 55 to 97 grams of fat and 285 to 375 grams of carbohydrates per day.

The new one-hour-a-day-total activity goal stems from studies of how much energy is expended on average each day by individuals who maintain a healthy weight. Energy expenditure is cumulative, including both low-intensity activities of daily life, such as stair climbing and housecleaning, and more vigorous exercise like swimming and cycling. Someone in a largely sedentary occupation can achieve the new exercise goal by engaging in a moderate-intensity activity, such as walking at 4 miles per hour, for a total of 60 minutes every day, or engaging in a high-intensity activity, such as jogging for 20 to 30 minutes four to seven days per week.

New Dietary Recommendations

Since the publication of the Recommended Dietary Allowances in 1989 and the Canadian Recommended Nutrient Intakes in 1990, new information has emerged about nutrient requirements that warrants the development of updated guidelines. This report, the sixth in a series, develops new guidelines for the United States and Canada for the consumption of energy, carbohydrates, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids, collectively known as macronutrients.

In the past, recommended dietary allowances or RDAs have served as the benchmarks of nutritional adequacy in the United States. The new Dietary Reference Intakes, or DRIs, are established using an expanded concept that includes indicators of good health and the prevention of chronic disease, as well as possible adverse effects of overconsumption. The panel assessed thousands of scientific studies linking excessive or inadequate consumption of fats, carbohydrates, and protein with increased risk for dietary deficiency diseases, obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and other chronic illnesses. The DRIs include not only recommended intakes, intended to help individuals meet their daily nutritional requirements, but also tolerable upper intake levels (ULs) that help them avoid harm from consuming too much of a nutrient.

The DRIs are designed to meet the needs of individuals who are healthy and free of specific diseases or conditions that may alter their daily nutritional requirements. It is expected that people known to have specific conditions or chronic diseases will get nutritional advice from their health professionals that is tailored to their special needs.

Concern About Added Sugars

Both children and adults should consume at least 130 grams of carbohydrates each day, the report says. However, this newly set RDA is based on the minimum amount of carbohydrates needed to produce enough glucose for the brain to function, and most people regularly consume far more.

The report suggests that added sugars should comprise no more than 25 percent of total calories consumed. Distinguished from natural sugars, such as lactose found in milk and fructose found in fruits, added sugars are those incorporated into foods and beverages during production. Major sources include candy, soft drinks, fruit drinks, pastries, and other sweets. The suggested maximum level stems from the evidence that people whose diets are high in added sugars have lower intakes of essential nutrients.

Are All Fats Bad?

Fat is a major source of energy for the body and aids in the absorption of essential vitamins. Some foods that are major contributors of fat in the diet include butter, margarine, vegetable oils, visible fat on meat and poultry, whole milk, egg yolks, and nuts. High-fat diets usually mean increased intakes of saturated fat, which can raise the amount of low-density lipoprotein and the level of "bad" cholesterol in the bloodstream of some individuals and heightens their risk for heart disease. Meats, baked goods, and full-fat dairy products are the main sources of saturated fat in most diets. Because saturated fat and cholesterol provide no known beneficial role in preventing chronic diseases, they are not required at any level in the diet, the report says. Recognizing that completely eliminating saturated fat and cholesterol from the typical diet in the United States or Canada would make it very difficult to meet other nutritional guidelines, the panel recommended keeping consumption as low as possible while maintaining a nutritionally adequate diet.

Monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, also present in fat, reduce blood cholesterol levels and thus lower the risk of heart disease when they replace saturated fats in the diet. People must get two types of polyunsaturated fatty acids, known as alpha-linolenic acid (an omega-3 fatty acid) and linoleic acid (an omega-6 fatty acid), from the foods they consume since neither is synthesized in the body. A lack of either one will result in symptoms of deficiency, including scaly skin and dermatitis, although these deficiencies are extremely rare in the United States and Canada. The report sets recommended intakes for linoleic acid, present in high levels in vegetable oils such as safflower oil or corn oil, at 17 grams per day for men and 12 grams per day for women based on average intakes in the United States. For alpha-linolenic acid, found in milk and some vegetable oils such as soybean and flaxseed oils, the recommendations are 1.6 and 1.1 grams per day for men and women, respectively.

Partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, such as those used in many margarines and shortenings, contain a particular form of unsaturated fat known as trans fatty acids. Trans fatty acids have physical properties generally resembling saturated fatty acids, and their presence tends to harden oils. The report's findings and recommendations on trans fatty acids were released in early July at the request of the Food and Drug Administration as an important step in its process to determine whether trans fat should be listed on nutrition labels. Often found in cookies, crackers, dairy products, meats, and fast food, trans fatty acids increase the risk of heart disease by boosting levels of bad cholesterol. Because they are not essential and provide no known health benefit, there is no safe level of trans fatty acids and people should eat as little of them as possible while consuming a nutritionally adequate diet. Because trans fatty acids occur in so many types of food, an all-out ban is impractical and would make it extremely difficult to get a nutritional adequate diet, the panel added.

New Facts on Fiber

The report contains the first recommended intake levels for fiber from the Food and Nutrition Board. The fiber recommendations are based on studies that show an increased risk for heart disease when diets low in fiber are consumed. Although there is some evidence to suggest that fiber in the diet may also help to prevent colon cancer and promote weight control, the data are inconclusive at this point. The recommended daily intake for total fiber for adults 50 years and younger is set at 38 grams for men and 25 grams for women, while for men and women over 50 it is 30 and 21 grams per day, respectively, due to decreased consumption of food. The report also provides recommended intakes for children and teenagers.
Many new food products are marketed as containing fiber, but the lack of a uniform definition of fiber for regulatory purposes casts doubts on the usefulness of some content claims. Therefore, the report provides a specific definition of what should be called fiber in food. It defines "total fiber" as the combination of "dietary" and "functional" fiber. Dietary fiber is the edible, nondigestible component of carbohydrates and lignin naturally found in plant food. Some foods with dietary fiber include cereal bran, flaked corn cereal, sweet potatoes, legumes, and onions. Functional fiber refers to those fiber sources that are shown to have similar health benefits as dietary fiber, but are isolated or extracted from natural sources or are synthetic. An example would be pectin extracted from citrus peel and used as a gel that is the basis for jams and jellies. The definition of functional fiber aims to exclude fiber-like products, whether extracted or synthesized, that cannot be shown to have proven health benefits. It is hoped that regulatory bodies in both the United States and Canada will work toward adopting these definitions.

Recommended Levels for Protein

The report establishes age-based requirements for the first time for all nine of the essential amino acids found in dietary protein. Values are included for pregnant women, infants, and children based on their special needs. Using new data, the report reaffirms previously established recommended levels of protein intake, which is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight for adults. Recommended intake of protein during pregnancy also is increased. Because data on the potential for high-protein diets to produce chronic or other diseases are often conflicting or inadequate, tolerable upper intake levels for consumption could not be determined for protein or for the individual amino acids. However, given the lack of data on overconsumption for some of these amino acids and protein, caution is warranted in consuming levels significantly above those normally found in foods.

This study was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; Health Canada; U.S. Food and Drug Administration; National Institutes of Health; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Defense; Institute of Medicine; the Dietary Reference Intakes Private Foundation Fund, including the Dannon Institute and the International Life Sciences Institute-North America; and the Dietary Reference Intakes Corporate Donors' Fund, contributors to which include Roche Vitamins Inc., Mead Johnson Nutrition Group, and M&M Mars.

The study was undertaken by scientists from the United States and Canada under the auspices of the Institute of Medicine's Food and Nutrition Board, which has been responsible for developing RDAs for United States for the last 60 years. The Institute of Medicine is a private, nonprofit organization that provides health policy advice under a congressional charter granted to the National Academy of Sciences.

:D
 
RE: The New Calorie Chart is in!!! Please check this ou...

Thanks, Wayne! You know I actually found this yesterday after you posted & thought I was looking at the wrong stuff. The metric system threw me off! I'm working on my thesis & just didn't feel like reading anymore when I got to this. So being lazy, just wanted you to supply the info.

Thank you very much for coming back. It's very interesting.
 
Ok, I've gone back & read the articles & the link from Jacqueline. I've even had others read them.

NO WHERE does any of the information posted mention these caloric intake as being for weight loss. What it does say is that this is the energy required for very active people to maintain a healthy body. The caloric intake needed to maintain for active (not very active) people would be about 200 calories less. In order to lose weight, one would need to reduce their caloric intake.

The rates listed above are consistent in both charts as being rates to MAINTAIN, not lose weight.
 
Hi, please be aware that their definition of VERY ACTIVE is a brisk low intensity walk! Even if you reduced the calories down by 200-400 it would still be more food than most people eat daily, and that was the point i was trying to make. Starving the body does not produce lasting weight loss.
 

Our Newsletter

Get awesome content delivered straight to your inbox.

Top