RE: Speaking of PC, can somebody help me understand Kw...
>jordan,
>I don't understand your post. The sending of announcements is
>to share the sender's news, and it's about the sender. When
>you send someone a card that says "have a happy birthday",
>it's not about the sender, it's about the sendee. It is
>self-evident that the sending of cards to wish someone a happy
>something is about the sendee, and not about the sender.
>Nancy
Nancy, you know I love you, but I just don't follow the logic here. How does a card originating from me suddenly become about you? I get loads of both generic holiday and Christmas-specific cards and I don't view them as that person attempting to convert me to their beliefs (or lack thereof). I look at them as an expression of the sendER's point of view and desire to share their holiday, not as some extension of me and my belief system. (Seriously, are we all so self-involved that we expect people to buy separate and distinct cards based on what we think will be least offensive to the recipient?)
I do my own thing for Christmas. My celebration is spiritual to me in that it is about my family. My cards always feature a cute picture of my kids and then some humorous or ironic caption written by me, because that represents us (cuteness, humor, irreverence). I don't expect that to be about the recipient, KWIM? And some people, I guess, might be really offended by my cards (for example, last year's card featured an ode to the future underwear models of America below a picture of the boys vamping). But I don't send cards to suit the recipient, I send them to suit me. Does that make sense?
Marie
>jordan,
>I don't understand your post. The sending of announcements is
>to share the sender's news, and it's about the sender. When
>you send someone a card that says "have a happy birthday",
>it's not about the sender, it's about the sendee. It is
>self-evident that the sending of cards to wish someone a happy
>something is about the sendee, and not about the sender.
>Nancy
Nancy, you know I love you, but I just don't follow the logic here. How does a card originating from me suddenly become about you? I get loads of both generic holiday and Christmas-specific cards and I don't view them as that person attempting to convert me to their beliefs (or lack thereof). I look at them as an expression of the sendER's point of view and desire to share their holiday, not as some extension of me and my belief system. (Seriously, are we all so self-involved that we expect people to buy separate and distinct cards based on what we think will be least offensive to the recipient?)
I do my own thing for Christmas. My celebration is spiritual to me in that it is about my family. My cards always feature a cute picture of my kids and then some humorous or ironic caption written by me, because that represents us (cuteness, humor, irreverence). I don't expect that to be about the recipient, KWIM? And some people, I guess, might be really offended by my cards (for example, last year's card featured an ode to the future underwear models of America below a picture of the boys vamping). But I don't send cards to suit the recipient, I send them to suit me. Does that make sense?
Marie