I'd be willing to bet good money the woman intended to sue before she even tried the product.
I was thinking the exact same thing.
I've read Jillian's "Making the Cut" (MTC) and I know she has always backed supplements as part of a kind of die-hard, last-minute "cutting" measure. She mentions ECA stacks in MTC - Ephedrine, Caffeine, and Aspirin, which is now illegal because it is a bit dangerous, although it IS evidently effective. Her new supplement line basically seemed to be designed along similar lines - willow bark is the source of aspirin, guarana contains lots of caffeine, and there are other assorted stimulants and diuretics and things in there.
Still, no pill is going to work all by itself. It's misleading to advertise "Just take 2 pills before meals and that's it!" I suppose if a person had very little experience with fitness/exercise/nutrition, it might seem plausible, especially given Jillian's reputation.
I also think it was pretty dumb and shill-tastic of her to endorse this stuff - a few consumers
might get some results that
might be attributed to the supplements, but seriously, do
most people who buy diet pills seriously integrate them with a sensible diet/exercise plan? If I were in Jillian's position, even if I really believed in supplementation, I think I'd decline to have my name on diet pills. Diet pills aren't the most helpful product to help people manage their health - they're mostly really good at generating cash for retailers.
So, to finally meander around to my point, yeah, I think it's possible that the lawsuit was planned. But if the pills were actually effective, there wouldn't be any question of a lawsuit. Nobody gets sued for saying "eat right and move more."
OK, maybe they do (this is America, after all), but probably less frequently than people who get sued for selling snake oil.