> I personally would skip a
>hostess twinkie but a nice sliver of homemade cheesecake with
>fresh strawberries on top on occasion is entirely another
>matter.
My point exactly.
Twinkies....shudder! (and talking about expense: how much do you think the raw ingredients for Twinkies cost? I'd say about 1/50 of what they charge for Twinkies).
I agree that organics are often more expensive (ie: direct cost to the consumer, not factoring in the real cost of non-0rganics, like the costs taxpayers are paying to subsidize non-organic food production). There are certain foods that it is wise to buy organic (soy, corn and canola, which, if not organic, are most likey GMO, for example, and some fruits and veggies that contain the highest quantity of, or the most toxic chemicals, expecially if you eat them unpeeled...you can find lists of these on the internet and in books).
I don't buy all organic, but I try to as much as I can. The organic apples I buy locally are sometimes actually cheaper than the non-organics, sometimes about the same, and sometimes more expensive.
The other day, I passed up the ridiculously overpriced organic cucumbers ($7 for two!!!) and went for the English cucumbers.
This summer, I'm growing my own organic beans, peas, cucumbers, tomatoes, kohlrabi and other odds and ends, and going to the local farmers market (where even the non-organic stuff is often less treated than foods in the supermarket).
The more demand there is for organic, the lower the prices will be. And it would help if our government subsidized organic growers they way it subsidizes non-organics.
BUT: 'eating clean' doesn't necessarily mean 'eating organic,' so I don't know why we got onto this tangent (though I'm happy to discuss it, as you can see!)