Women may Ovulate more than once a Month - Article

dani21496

Cathlete
Interesting article!

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...e=2&u=/nm/20030708/hl_nm/ovulate_frequency_dc

Women May Ovulate More Than Once a Month, Study Says
Tue Jul 8, 5:48 PM ET Add Health - Reuters to My Yahoo!


By Maggie Fox

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - No wonder the rhythm method does not work so well for birth control -- scientists in Canada said on Tuesday they had found women sometimes ovulate several times in a single month.



Their finding, if verified, would overturn the traditional wisdom that women produce an egg cell once a month. It would also help explain why "natural" methods of birth control, based on the idea that ovulation can be predicted, often fail.


"We are literally going to have to re-write medical textbooks," said Dr. Roger Pierson, director of the Reproductive Biology Research Unit at the University of Saskatchewan, who led the study.


"It's exactly why the rhythm method doesn't work."


Scientists have long known that humans have unique cycles of ovulation. Many animals come into heat -- a time when all the males around know through smells and visual signals that a female is ovulating and ready to conceive.


Not so with humans, who have "concealed" ovulation.


Standard medical science says a woman has a cycle running roughly 28 days in which an egg ripens, is released by the follicle, drops into the fallopian tube, and then is either fertilized or shed during menstruation.


Writing in the journal Fertility and Sterility, Pierson and colleagues found this did not always happen.


"We weren't expecting this. We really weren't," Pierson said in a telephone interview.


DAILY ULTRASOUND SCANS


In the study, Pierson, veterinarian Gregg Adams and graduate student Angela Baerwald did daily, high-resolution ultrasound scans on 63 women for a month, which allowed them to see the follicles very clearly.


"We had 63 women with normal menstrual cycles. Of those 63, only 50 had normal ovarian cycles," Pierson said.


Thirteen of the women ovulated multiple times, in various different ways. And of the other 50, 40 percent had up to three waves of activity by the follicles, any one of which could result in the production of an egg.


The women's hormone levels did not match this activity, Pierson said. "Hopefully this will help women explain how they got pregnant when they really didn't want to be pregnant, and it certainly will help us design better fertility therapies."


Apparently, measuring hormones in the blood is not enough to predict what a woman's reproductive system is up to.


"The hormones do what they are going to do and the ovaries just follow their merry path," Pierson said.


"We always thought that menstrual cycles and ovarian cycles were one and the same. It turns out they are just like two political parties -- sometimes they go along hand in hand for the good of the country and sometimes they go along their separate ways."

Pierson's team plans longer-term studies to see if the women's patterns are consistent from month to month.

"We don't know what's causing it -- we don't know if it is the weather or exposure to men or grapefruit juice or what," Pierson said.

The findings, which were first seen in cattle and horses, help explain some things that have puzzled obstetricians, Pierson said.

"It really explains how we get fraternal twins with different conception days," Pierson said. "Clinically, we see this all the time. We see women come in with twins and when we do an ultrasound we see one is at one 10 weeks development and another at seven."
 
What I am wondering is how years on fake hormones have altered ovulation to possibly result in this type of pattern. Could it be that we do generally ovulate normally, but years of hormonal drug manipulation have altered our bodies, not always for the better as they claim. Does the article mentioned whom they performed these studies on? I haven't looked at the article yet, but am curious....thanks for posting...very interesting.

Briee
 
> Does the article
>mentioned whom they performed these studies on? I haven't
>looked at the article yet, but am curious....thanks for
>posting...very interesting.
>

They did the study on 63 women.

"We had 63 women with normal menstrual cycles. Of those 63, only 50 had normal ovarian cycles," Pierson said.

Thirteen of the women ovulated multiple times, in various different ways. And of the other 50, 40 percent had up to three waves of activity by the follicles, any one of which could result in the production of an egg.


The women's hormone levels did not match this activity, Pierson said. "Hopefully this will help women explain how they got pregnant when they really didn't want to be pregnant, and it certainly will help us design better fertility therapies."


Apparently, measuring hormones in the blood is not enough to predict what a woman's reproductive system is up to.


"The hormones do what they are going to do and the ovaries just follow their merry path," Pierson said.
 
Hi Danielle, thanks for your reply....I don't think I was making complete sense up there so I'll try again. (typical problem for a pregnant woman!!) I was wondering out of the 63 women, how many had been on birth control hormones in the past and how many had never taken hormonally altering drugs. Was just wondering if there was a difference.

For example some women may have been on the pill for 7 years and then gone off for a few years and then been part of this study, verses someone who had never taken birth control. Was wondering if they noted this or not. I really believe being on artificial hormones is affecting women to a much greater extent than doctor's either admit or actually know. Again, interesting study, but I want to know the answer to that question.

Briee
 
Briee,

I don't think the article mentions if any of those 63 had taken the pill before or not.

It talks about the "rhythm method" not working all the time because of this, so obviously they wouldn't be on the pill. But it doesn't say if they had ever been on the pill previously.

That's a good question.
 

Our Newsletter

Get awesome content delivered straight to your inbox.

Top