LeaX - that ecard is a HOOT!! I warmly send you a huge thank you. You're so thoughtful! And your name belongs on that card, too! What is Chinese face reading? The spa sounds so awesome....except for the bit about not eating. That's what vacations are all about! I mean, who really goes on a cruise just to see the waves?
TraciX - I'm so glad you enjoyed PP! I love, love that one for the fun factor. I've done the version where you repeat everything twice and that really does add good intensity, especially if you're heavy-ing up. That's very smart to add on the back and chest work! Please don't tell me you haven't done SuperSets yet, either? PP's my favourite of the two, but SS is a close second.
TracyX - Yes, apparently one pound of fat is 3500 calories, but not every pound we see on the scale is fat. My weight is 2 pounds higher today than on Tuesday, and I know I didn't overeat that much! A major reason for scale-weight fluctuations is the quantity of carbs we have stored in our liver and muscles as glycogen, and the accompanying water required to store said carbs. For every ounce of glycogen stored in your muscles, your body stores 3 ounces of water. When people deplete their glycogen stores (which themselves have weight) via exercise, their body weight drops. The loss of glycogen and the accompanying water are the reason. This is also why low-carb eating makes people lighter and leaner looking, rather quickly. Unfortunately, your body needs glycogen, especially your brain. It gobbles up a very large proportion of your body's stores and if it's lacking, people have a hard time concentrating, can become depressed, and begin craving simple carbs. So, a high-carb "treat" will bring with it not just a few extra calories, but also fill up your body with glycogen and water, and the scale will reflect that. I know my 2 pounds from Tuesday was due to my lack of cardio workout today, and the carb-dense eating I did yesterday (even though it was all healthy, high-fiber, low-glycemic carbs). Are you familiar with all of this, already? Btw, my mood is also excellent today, which is also a reflection of having a good level of glycogen in my system. I learned all of this from Nancy Clark's book on Sports Nutrition. It's an excellent resource.
Okay, back to me
Thank you Traci, Lea and Tracy for your comments on my generic rotation.
Traci - I'm flattered you want to do it! Of course, by July you could be on to ironman competitions or something, so I won't hold you to it
Lea - I've heard that argument about cardio burning muscle, and here's my thoughts. I think they mean an "excessive" amount of cardio, but am not sure where that line is. I don't think (hope) 30-60 mins, 6 days a week, of a mixture of high and low impact, fast and slow paced, will be excessive. Second, at this point I'm so frustrated with my stomach fat that I'm willing to give up some of my muscle if the stomach fat goes along with it. I've heard for years that the defined, cut look requires lower body fat, not necessarily bigger muscles. I know my muscles are somewhere underneath this layer of chub. It's time to find them! Oh yeah, and even if I lose *some* muscle, it's certainly not going to be *all*. I'm not really going for quantity, anyways; just quality. I thought P90X would increase my muscle definition by building more muscle. Well, I built more muscle, but didn't get any more defined. But don't just accept my explanation. If you know something I don't about this, please feel free to fill me in.
Tracy - Thank you for playing devil's advocate! Your comments are appreciated. I guess I need to clarify that a higher cardio approach did work for me when I was attempting to lose weight. In fact, I lost 72 pounds 4 years ago, using a similar approach. I became very overweight after DD#1 was born. When she was 2 years old I said "enough!" and dusted off my 3 Cathe step workouts that I owned, and alternated them with yoga. I also started Weight Watchers. As I dropped the pounds I ordered more Cathe workouts, and began doing her weight work. 9 months later, I was lighter than before my pregnancy, had some nice muscle definition starting, and was really happy with how I looked. Unfortunately, I was becoming very unhappy, tired, and it seemed to be taking a whole lot of effort to keep my weight down. I was relieved to get pregnant again so I could stop trying to fight my cravings! Exercise kept my weight in check during my pregnancy, and afterwards, but I'm still carrying around a very generous middle. I went back to WW for a while, and finally saw the last 10 pounds begin to decline, albeit slowwwwly. I was also feeling deprived and tired again. At the time I thought I was probably overdoing the cardio, and all that exercise wasn't working. So, I turned to P90X because it seemed to be what I needed: less cardio, and lowered body fat due to muscle gain. While I certainly gained muscle, I think the biggest benefit I got from P90X was in increasing my calories. I'm thinking better than I have in years, my attitude is more positive, I have less anxiety, and I have more patience for my kids. But my weight is slowly creeping up again. I'm trying to find a decent balance now between getting enough cardio to gradually reduce my body fat, and enough calories to fuel my body and my brain. I know that to lower body fat, you have to burn calories and get the metabolism boosted. I have a really good layer of active muscle tissue now, thanks to P90X. So now I think I need to just try and burn off the excess fat stores with more cardio. But to be successful, I think the key will be in keeping my caloric intake moderately high: around 1800 a day. That's very high, if you're a WW member. This has been my goal for the last 4 days, and I'm finding it's enough to keep me feeling comfortable during the day. My night time snacking is getting much easier to ignore. Hopefully this will do the trick. There's no guarantees, of course, but in my world, this approach is definitely different. I agree with your comment that shaking up the exercise method can be very beneficial, but unfortunately I don't have very many options in that regard, at this time. And in that situation, I think the critical point is that *some* form of exercise be done, even if it's not the *most* beneficial. It's still better than none! I am planning on adding some skipping routines, so that will be a bit different. And hopefully in a few weeks I can start running again on Saturday mornings. I've probably replied in much more detail than you wanted (but it kept me out of the kitchen for a while)! I wanted you to know that I completely understand your comments, and this is my rationale for my new approach. Please feel free to continue to challenge or question any of this, as that's how I manage to (eventually) learn and try new things.
Have a good night!
SandraX