Strength vs. Power: Why Your Workout Needs Both for Lifelong Fitness

forum_admin

Administrator
Staff member
3-3-25.jpg

When it comes to fitness it often seems like the trends change faster than we can master them. It can be frustrating trying to figure out the best way to manage our schedules and meet out fitness goals. With all the different exercise buzzwords always flying around, it can be a challenge to figure out what should be next on our fitness agenda.

Over the past year my series have had a strong focus on functional training. Although it may seem like this type of training is just the latest and greatest in a long line of fitness styles, the truth is that this type of training is here to stay. Without even realizing it we have been performing functional training exercises for years, that have kept our bodies primed for the things that we need to do each day. The difference between what we have been doing all along and what we’re doing with our new functional focus, is the importance that we’re placing on overlooked details, like balance and stability, as well as the extra attention that we’re putting on WHY we are performing certain training techniques and what they will do for us as we age.

So, what do I mean by putting extra attention on the “why”? As an example, let’s talk about strength training versus power training. Strength and power are related, but they are not the same. Strength refers to our ability to exert force. Think carrying your groceries, pushing open a heavy door, or lifting a child. Power refers to our ability to exert that force quickly, like when we jump up out of a chair, catch ourselves as we start to fall, or must cross a street before the walk signal runs out. Strength is crucial in enabling us to perform everyday tasks while power is essential for balance and the ability to perform dynamic movements.

As we age the decline in our muscle power is even greater than the losses we face with our strength. At around the age of 50 we begin to lose fast twitch muscle fibers. This creates a greater need for training techniques that can generate gains in our power.

In our functional training workouts, when we choose to pick up slightly lighter weights and move at a faster pace, we are not always doing so to make the exercise “easier”. We are in fact, working on our ability to move the weight and our muscles at a quicker pace. We’re working on our power! That’s the “why.” While the exercise may feel easier than other heavy weight, slower paced exercises, it is still playing a very important role in our overall health and abilities.

In my new Lift, Move & Restore 2: ELEVATED! series, we will explore the techniques and benefits of both strength and power training. By including training techniques that work on our power we can help build faster reflexes which in turn will help us react quicker to dangerous situations and help to prevent falls and injuries. We will also continue to focus on the reasoning behind functional training and why it is so important at all phases of life, but most especially as we age.

Pre-Order LMR2 Elevated Now: | Click Here |
 
I thought it said that the cardio in the new ones would all be low impact.....but you could always take it up!
Yeah, I think Elevated's cardio is Low Impact .... so important for my late-60's years-old, actively aging & arthritic knees. :)

(Maybe some plyo for the next series for those with younger, non-arthritic joints - but then again, Cathe's OG knee is probably arthritic too - maybe she wants to preserve it too).
 
My knees are “old” but relatively healthy, so I sprinkle in plyometrics for bone health. The LIFTMOR studies are really interesting in this regard. I also thought Tracie Long did a great job in her workouts of putting in just the right amount without injury or overkill
 
Heading into my 7th decade a bit later on this year, and my knees do get squeaky. However, I've read several articles recently about how beneficial plyometrics can be in averting bone density losses as they simultaneously improve strength and functional movement--even among older populations. Was just wondering if they could be reasonably incorporated somehow in this new series.
 
My knees are “old” but relatively healthy, so I sprinkle in plyometrics for bone health
You are fortunate! I was too until last year. I also did some impact for my bones but then tore my meniscus & MCL doing a fun, but aggressive rebounder workout. Supposedly low impact but with lots of twists and pivots. Injuries can happen to any of us and I was told any arthritis puts us at increased risk for injury, because it's degenerative to the joint. My arthritis was not (apparently) problematic until the injury, but I sadly learned it was a problem. It's lower impact all the time now and it has been an adjustment for me. Medicare isn't quick to approve a knee replacement either (at least not my plan). So if you have no arthritis, impact away & enjoy it :). I used to.
 
... I also thought Tracie Long did a great job in her workouts of putting in just the right amount without injury or overkill
Please enlighten me! Any particular Tracie Long you recommend? I wasn't much of a Firm fan but I think we had one of her workouts on VHS back in the day ... Strong Bear or something like that, and a 5-day ab VHS, but not sure who the instructor was ... just recall a male, shirtless hunk who did the intro to each day's workout.:D
 
Yeah, I agree, actively aging & arthritic knees describes me as well. IMO, I don’t think the two ( actively aging/arthritic knees & plyometrics) go together too good..

I do really like the Low Impact Bonus in LMR….
My knee problems have actually resolved over the past year of Cathe workouts. It's more my low back issues that are the problem for me (which have also improved over this past year). But now in my 60's, I definitely want that low impact. NO WAY would I be able to do the high impact more than a couple of times a week.
 
My knees are “old” but relatively healthy, so I sprinkle in plyometrics for bone health. The LIFTMOR studies are really interesting in this regard. I also thought Tracie Long did a great job in her workouts of putting in just the right amount without injury or overkill
Tracie Long is one of my favorite instructors. I have every single workout she's made. I LOVE her Signature Series & her Figure 30 series.
 
Please enlighten me! Any particular Tracie Long you recommend? I wasn't much of a Firm fan but I think we had one of her workouts on VHS back in the day ... Strong Bear or something like that, and a 5-day ab VHS, but not sure who the instructor was ... just recall a male, shirtless hunk who did the intro to each day's workout.:D
I haven't met a Tracie Long workout that I don't like. And I have every one she's ever made, including The Firm, FitPrime & WHFN ones. I particularly enjoy her Signature Series. The ab one you are remembering is from the Firm Parts - 5 Day Abs. It's a compilation of ab work from different Firm workouts. I think the hunk's name is Tracy James.
 
Tracie Long is one of my favorite instructors
Yes, I have most all Firms, FitPrime, Kick Butt, the ones that Anna produced after the Firm. and I have most
all the ones that Annette found & put out after Anna's passing. I have alot of Tracie's after she started back
on her own and Stephanie Huckabee's PowerFit ones. I loved Stephanie as well, she, of course, was a
Firm instructor before.

I think the hunk's name is Tracy James.
Deanna, I do believe you are correct! I knew "James" was the last name...
 
....The LIFTMOR studies are really interesting in this regard ....
Thanks for mentioning this! Based on Braille's post on Leg Day and your mention of this study, I went to read more about the study. Too bad they didn't research the lifting separately from the impact cardio ... maybe in future studies they will. Please keep us posted if you find more on the difference between high intensity lifting vs impact and the effects on bone density.
 

Our Newsletter

Get awesome content delivered straight to your inbox.

Top