I lifted this from a blog on National Review Online:
Top 10 Reasons Chicago Didn't Get the Olympics
10. Dead people can't vote at IOC meetings
9. Obama distracted by 25 min meeting with Gen. McChrystal
8. Who cares if Obama couldn't talk the IOC into Chicago? He'll be able to talk Iran out of nukes.
7. The impediment is Israel still building settlements.
6. Obviously no president would have been able to acomplish it.
5. We've been quite clear and said all along that we didn't want the Olympics.
4. This isn't about the number of Olympics "lost", it's about the number of Olympics "saved" or "created".
3. Clearly not enough wise Latina judges on the committee
2. Because the IOC is racist.
1. It's George Bush's fault.
I lifted this from a blog on National Review Online:
Top 10 Reasons Chicago Didn't Get the Olympics
10. Dead people can't vote at IOC meetings
9. Obama distracted by 25 min meeting with Gen. McChrystal
8. Who cares if Obama couldn't talk the IOC into Chicago? He'll be able to talk Iran out of nukes.
7. The impediment is Israel still building settlements.
6. Obviously no president would have been able to acomplish it.
5. We've been quite clear and said all along that we didn't want the Olympics.
4. This isn't about the number of Olympics "lost", it's about the number of Olympics "saved" or "created".
3. Clearly not enough wise Latina judges on the committee
2. Because the IOC is racist.
1. It's George Bush's fault.
I lifted this from a blog on National Review Online:
Top 10 Reasons Chicago Didn't Get the Olympics
10. Dead people can't vote at IOC meetings
9. Obama distracted by 25 min meeting with Gen. McChrystal
8. Who cares if Obama couldn't talk the IOC into Chicago? He'll be able to talk Iran out of nukes.
7. The impediment is Israel still building settlements.
6. Obviously no president would have been able to acomplish it.
5. We've been quite clear and said all along that we didn't want the Olympics.
4. This isn't about the number of Olympics "lost", it's about the number of Olympics "saved" or "created".
3. Clearly not enough wise Latina judges on the committee
2. Because the IOC is racist.
1. It's George Bush's fault.
I lifted this from a blog on National Review Online:
Top 10 Reasons Chicago Didn't Get the Olympics
10. Dead people can't vote at IOC meetings
9. Obama distracted by 25 min meeting with Gen. McChrystal
8. Who cares if Obama couldn't talk the IOC into Chicago? He'll be able to talk Iran out of nukes.
7. The impediment is Israel still building settlements.
6. Obviously no president would have been able to acomplish it.
5. We've been quite clear and said all along that we didn't want the Olympics.
4. This isn't about the number of Olympics "lost", it's about the number of Olympics "saved" or "created".
3. Clearly not enough wise Latina judges on the committee
2. Because the IOC is racist.
1. It's George Bush's fault.
Stay Classy! It must warm the cockles of your heart to think that the President lost the Olympic bid. He got what he had coming right? What you and a few others on this thread fail to understand is that it wasn't about him and it wasn't for him. Chicago has been working for this since 2007. Thousands of people worked hard for this and 84% of Americans would have like to see the Olympics in Chicago. Obama is not hurting from this, the people of Chicago are, so go ahead and laugh it up. He went there because the city asked him to and G.W would have done the same thing for his home town. Our president and other heads of state from the other four countries went there and sang the praises of their country, but only here, in America, you will find a bloc of people who just wanted him to fail and take joy in it.
If Democrats did some crap like this, they'd be branded Un-American.
The more I listen to some elements on the right, the more repulsed I get. It is not about a legitimate disagreement or different view. That I think would be healthy and a debate about the issues is what should happen but to say NO to every.single.thing without having a plan of their own makes them look like opportunists. It is vicious, it is unproductive and it is just about disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing and the hope for political gain, all of this aimed at derailing this president, and thus deliberately taking the risk that things get worse for America. Shame on those people!
I agree, and I also find this on the democrat side. I have some views that agree with the typical republican, and some views that agree with the typical democrat. If I ever say something about Obama that I don't agree with or like, I get attacked by democrats that want to defend everything he does. No party is perfect, and no president is perfect, republican or democrat, and I wish we could all realize that and work together - rather than make it about shouting matches to see who can yell I'M RIGHT louder than the other guy.
I agree, there are some on the left that just make me roll my eyes. I happen to think that it is not about race every time someone disagrees with Obama and I get really annoyed when people cry racism everytime someone disagrees with the president. Uggggh!!
No party is perfect! There are a lot of things that I agree with on the right but a lot more on the left It's the viciousness and venom spewed - quite frankly most predominantly on the extreme right though - that is starting to get to me.
It's the viciousness and venom spewed - quite frankly most predominantly on the extreme right though - that is starting to get to me.
Do the math on the travel expense - two planes (727 AND 747), staff, security - all of the media outlets were reporting 1.5 mil. It's not rocket science.
Carola - you have an opinion of EVERYTHING don't you?
Carola I agree with you, though I think the viciousness has had fair share on both sides here. There were some awful, appalling things said about Bush during his time in office. This is short-term memory loss by both of the parties: Liberals are now crying foul against the attacks on Obama, conveniently forgetting the hideous things said about Bush. Conservatives cried foul during Bush's presidency because they felt that he/conservatives would be attacked by the left no matter what was said/done/suggested. Now they are doing the same thing to Obama and the liberals.
Both parties have and are acting like spoiled children with their "well they started it!" attitudes. They exhaust me. And the venom gets us nowhere.
Agreed! It is not a big secret that I can't stand George W Bush but I thought some of the attacks from the left were outrageous. It's uncalled for and leads nowhere!
But I do think there was no comparison between the attacks on Bush and the attacks on Obama. Maybe that is a matter of perceiption but to hear people say that they pray for Obama to be killed, people going to an Obama townhall with a gun strapped on, the rhetoric gets really scary, not only from Rush Limbaughs and Glenn Becks of this world.
You say that like it is wrong to have an opinion! But I guess it's only okay to have an opinion when it is the same as yours.
I am sure President Bush' and Laura Bush's 4-day pleasure trip to watch the Olympics in Bejing cost nothin. But I guess that's different It may have escaped your attention that President Obama also met with the Afghan war commander Gen. McChrystal who flew from London to Copenhagen. I guess President Obama is able to multi-task.