The more I think about this, I actually find it very offensive that Chek does his best to convince vegetarians and vegans he works with to include animal products in their diets. And he dismisses ethical objections as if those who have them are illogical, unreasoning fools who don't know what's best for them. His own "logic" doesn't stand up to analysis. I once read a quote that "man is not a rational animal, but rather a rationalizing animal" seems to fit Chek in this case.
I'd like to meet the 'many' vegetarians he's worked with that are unhealthy. I'm sure they could be healthier without adding animal products.
And who are these sources he's quoting to support his arguments?
Frankly, I think he's gone off the deep end! He also seems to be into that blood-type diet, though I couldn't bring myself to read much more of his ideas on diet or "sprirtuality" to be sure.
Hmmmm...the symbol he posts on his site is a SNAKE...he seems to be making it one of his causes to discount ethical reasons for avoiding animal products, thus turning people away from their beliefs...who does this sound like? }(
>>I think it's funny that people assume that a vegetarian diet is unheathy because they've met people who were unheathy vegetarians. It's like believing that driving is unsafe because you've met an unsafe driver!! Makes no sense whatsoever!!<<<
Unfortunately, it seems that there are quite a few people who make generalizations about veg*ns based on one or two cases. It's like to them, as a veg*n,, you represent your entire 'race', and if you have any health problem...it's because you're a veg*n!