Hey guys, The Fed. Disabilities Act was passed decades ago in an effort to mainstream children who had severe disabilities. The law was passed, and the school districts had to figure out how to incorporate the children into the classrooms. I mention this because it was a wonderful milestone in achieving equality among students. The districts are now overloaded with requests for services for children who can function fairly well, but need help. I'm not a fan of the "district" machine, but I understand their plight. They are severely overworked.
My guess is that your first meeting will be a "presentation" of the facts. The principal, psychologist, speech therapist and a plethera of other therapists will be in attendance. By law, they have 90 days to get back to you with their findings. Then you have another meeting deciding whether services are needed or just extra help. Presenting your outside doctor's findings is helpful, but not necessarily a shoe-in. So don't be disappointed in the length of time the "machine" needs to move! As a teacher of at-risk preschoolers, I have never seen a child be diagnosed AND receive services in the same school year. It takes that long.
I have always been against meds until my own son fell apart. I thought it was an easy out to give meds. It took some trial and error in finding the best med for him (about 8 months). It has been a miracle, I kid you not. We were absolutely in shock at the immediate change in him - for the better. It's like he became the kid he was supposed to be. So now my opinion has changed. The best analogy I can think of is this: Your standing in a dense fog and your teacher is holding a book 4 ft away, asking you to read it. You can't because of the fog. She keeps asking you to read and you keep saying that you can read, just not in the fog. Get out of the fog and you can read it just fine. What these kids don't know is that they're in a fog. Take them out of it and they discover a whole new life where it's easier to see. Alexis