CathydsRNA
Cathlete
Hi, I was thinking of getting one but the reviews I have done on BF% analysis have indicated that electrical impedence measurements are the least accurate of all methods currently available but nevertheless.... My question is why are there two modes; one for people who work out and one for those who are less active. The measurement should be the measurement (ie. you have X% fat ot you have Y% fat...end of question). Its either fat or it isn't no matter what your exercise level. The algorhythm the instrument uses must make certain assumptions based on how much you exercise...it doesn't make sense. Has anyone with an Omron tested their BF% using the two different modes? How different were the readings? It really shouldn't be different because as I said fat is fat and if the instrument is using an additional algorhythm, I don't think I would trust the reading very much. Also I have read that the Omron's reading is more accurate for the upper body and those who use electrical impedence scales that they stand on have a much higher BF% reading because these tend to give lower body BF% . Anyone have both a scale type device (Tanita) and an Omron. Are the BF% very different. A lot of questions I know. Thanks



