Vee
Cathlete
By my mid thirties, I had gained 25 pounds over a few years from a sedentary lifestyle and bad eating habits.
When I first realized what I was doing to myself and decided to clean up my act, I did cardio and "toning" exercises with little to no weight. The scales did not budge.
It was then that I discovered Cathe and heavyish lifting.
Simultaneous to discovering Cathe I also educated myself on nutrition and clean eating. I thought I was eating healthy but my diet was too heavy on processed carbs. I was not getting enough protein. I was / am vegetarian. The only thing right about my diet was that I ate adequate fruits and veggies.
For some reason I started out with Cathe's 3 day body splits rather than full body workouts. I mixed in cardio twice a week in my rotation. I met a trainer who encouraged me to continue with split body / endurance style lifting (rep range 15 to 16 with heavy enough weights to hit failure). I ate really well (balanced, no under-eating or over-eating) In three months my body transformed totally. I was lean and firm and looked strong. The 25 pounds had gone, but there was in some ways a better body than me at this same weight earlier. I wasnt even trying to lose weight that fast and would have been content to see it drop slower. I did not "bulk" at all.
This MRT approach says splits are more of a body building thing. (MRT style lifting is not just full body routines. It is different from some full body workouts that emhpasize isolation exercises for small muscle groups.) MRT recommends that circuit training (full body) with compound exercises (not simultaneous upper and lower body "compound", but multi-joint") and short rest breaks, set as a a routine that keeps heart rate elevated are best to lose fat. MRT refers to "after burn" and Exercise Post Oxygen Consumption to talk about effects on metabolism from this type of workout, even when the body is not exercising. That sounds a bit gimmicky to me.
Does it not matter at all what you do, as long as you are consistent and that you are shocking your body?
If MRT is really the "best way" to get lean, how come I saw great results with split training in my mid thirties? (I am 41 now).
??
??
BTW, I have just started a new rotation based on MRT. Too early for results yet, but I want to see what it does for me. I regained some weight from indulging in my old, bad habits. Sigh! But this gives me a chance to see how I fare with this style of training, so perhaps there is a silver lining. The workouts are a lot of fun (My sis got the routines off the internet and I do them on my own at the gym). They are also way more time efficient and since my work is particularly demanding right now, I appreciate that.
Personally, I like splits. They have always worked for me and even if MRT works I am sure I will still go back to splits even if just to vary my routine.
When I first realized what I was doing to myself and decided to clean up my act, I did cardio and "toning" exercises with little to no weight. The scales did not budge.
It was then that I discovered Cathe and heavyish lifting.
Simultaneous to discovering Cathe I also educated myself on nutrition and clean eating. I thought I was eating healthy but my diet was too heavy on processed carbs. I was not getting enough protein. I was / am vegetarian. The only thing right about my diet was that I ate adequate fruits and veggies.
For some reason I started out with Cathe's 3 day body splits rather than full body workouts. I mixed in cardio twice a week in my rotation. I met a trainer who encouraged me to continue with split body / endurance style lifting (rep range 15 to 16 with heavy enough weights to hit failure). I ate really well (balanced, no under-eating or over-eating) In three months my body transformed totally. I was lean and firm and looked strong. The 25 pounds had gone, but there was in some ways a better body than me at this same weight earlier. I wasnt even trying to lose weight that fast and would have been content to see it drop slower. I did not "bulk" at all.
This MRT approach says splits are more of a body building thing. (MRT style lifting is not just full body routines. It is different from some full body workouts that emhpasize isolation exercises for small muscle groups.) MRT recommends that circuit training (full body) with compound exercises (not simultaneous upper and lower body "compound", but multi-joint") and short rest breaks, set as a a routine that keeps heart rate elevated are best to lose fat. MRT refers to "after burn" and Exercise Post Oxygen Consumption to talk about effects on metabolism from this type of workout, even when the body is not exercising. That sounds a bit gimmicky to me.
Does it not matter at all what you do, as long as you are consistent and that you are shocking your body?
If MRT is really the "best way" to get lean, how come I saw great results with split training in my mid thirties? (I am 41 now).
??
??BTW, I have just started a new rotation based on MRT. Too early for results yet, but I want to see what it does for me. I regained some weight from indulging in my old, bad habits. Sigh! But this gives me a chance to see how I fare with this style of training, so perhaps there is a silver lining. The workouts are a lot of fun (My sis got the routines off the internet and I do them on my own at the gym). They are also way more time efficient and since my work is particularly demanding right now, I appreciate that.
Personally, I like splits. They have always worked for me and even if MRT works I am sure I will still go back to splits even if just to vary my routine.
Last edited:
