I have a couple more ideas to add to this discussion.
1) we all seem worried that the child will be traumatized by the BMI being recorded on their report card. Why are we assuming this? How can this information, recorded on a document shared only between the school's admin staff and the parents, maybe also the gym teacher, possibly become public knowledge and therefore a source of public shame?
2) schools have been actively involved in a broad spectrum of care for children for the last 50 years. Schools face federal/state laws to have children's eyes and ears tested at regular intervals and those findings reported to parents on confidential letters, in a sealed envelope, just as report cards arrive in the parents hands, in a sealed envelope (at least they do here in Michigan). So in addition to the school's attention to privacy of communication, we have here the school actively involved in maintenance of good child health. I don't see a whole lot of difference between BMI being recorded and deafness in one ear or chronic short sight being recorded (which has happened to my child). They are both statements to the parents of health concerns that need to be addressed for the child's optimal health to be restored.
3) Why, since schools have already been involved in maintenance of child health, are we so concerned now that they should not be so?
Hilary Clinton believes "it takes a village": whether you like her platitudinous sentiment or not, she has a point: parents alone do not create a healthy citizen of tomorrow.
4.) many schools already police the food and drink offerings available on their school site. My children do not have access on school to either candy, soda, chips, or any junk of that nature.
5) Even if it were available, this parent has no intention of ever giving her kids the money to buy such items. Parents do have control over their children's actions, we do not have to throw up our hands and claim it's not our fault/responsibility or whatever.
6) You cannot lay the blame entirely on schools for the fact that children choose junk food and become obese. I regularly accompany my children on field trips through the school and I am appalled at the contents of the sack lunch of many of the other kids.
In June, I took a discreet, good look at what the other kids were eating: one kid had 3 pouches of capri sun with all the sugar that contains: she drank them all and ate nothing of her sandwich because she was too full. Another kid had an enormous bag of chips, and that's all she had time to eat, in 20 mins. Another kid, sporting, at age 6, a mouth full of metal, pulled out of her lunch a bag of M&M's and shouted "yeah! candy!!" and guess what she ate for lunch? She shunned the rest of her "Lunchables" pre-packaged meal in favour of the candy. This is criminal.
I talked to some of the teachers after the meal was over at the kids' museum field trip and they, mostly mothers themselves, were disgusted, but have no control over what these kids eat for lunch. How can they have?
These kids are learning lessons from their parents about what foods constitute a lunch: chips, candy and sugar drinks. Our example, i.e. what we make available to them routinely, is what they learn from and what they will practice when left to their own devices.
I applaud schools' recording BMI on report cards.
In June, my kids' report cards featured a special 2 page supplement from their gym teacher who I admire and love and chat to on a regular basis. He detailed the fitness tests the kids had taken throughout the year, their aerobic capacity, their strength, agility, balance, co-ordination, and THEIR BMI!!!!!! I was so pleased to receive a report card from the sports teacher. I have talked to him about his sports/gym policies and watched classes in action and I am pleased to report that this man is a model: he teaches gym the way it never was taught to me. The emphasis is on movement, fun, they listen to great blasting pop music throughout the session, kids run about screaming with the fun, the effort, the exhilaration of his lessons. He offers stations arounds the room that target different aspects of fitness: some coordination (throw the ball at this target), some strength (can you shimmy up the rope?), some speed (fartlek short distance speed running), agility (can you spin this hoop around on your hips for a minute?) etc, etc. And if a kid can't shimmy up the rope? No matter, you get to swing on it instead: the mantra: GET MOVING AND DO SOMETHING PHYSICAL NO MATTER WHAT!
We need more gym teachers like this man, and we need schools to get involved on our kids' behalf, because some parents just are not invloved enough. It's the truth.
These are my opinions, I stand by them. You can of course respectfully disagree, but don't blast me for them!
Cheers
CLare