Did anyone else hear Jamie Lee on the radio today?
If you didn't, you missed a treat. She was on the Diane Rehm show, talking about her new book for children "I'm gonna like me," and about issues regarding self esteem, particularly for women.
She is aiming her message at the parents of young children since apparently problems with self esteem (self acceptance) development start very early.
I was so impressed with the cut-through-the-bullshit attitude of this woman. Having realized that she made a career from her body, that she has made her body worse through unnecessary medical proceedures (nips and tucks, liposuction), she agreed to be on the cover of More magazine (in your standard air-brushed hi glam photo shoot) only if inside the mag they did photos of her her way: head to toe, full body, in her unglam undies with visible saddle bags, spare tire, unmuscled look: i.e. displaying the normal body of a fortysomething woman. She forced More mag to agree to write in the article that it takes 13 people to make a woman 'decent looking enough' for a front cover of a glam mag (i.e. any mag for women), that all those people are needed to do hair, make up, lighting, select a dress, hold it up with safety pins at the back so it actually looks good on her, and then do the post production air brushing.
Jamie lee made the most pertinent point that she will no longer agree to make a living out of selling a lie to women: i.e. as she said on the radio, no-one looks like the faces on the covers of these mags, and that includes the models themselves who serve as canvases. She made the comment that she herself would just love Michelle Pfiffer to get photographed in her undies sans make up, because it would be a realistic image of what a woman her age looks like, that this would mean so much to her, it would do so much for the self-acceptance of women everywhere.
She made the point also that she does go to the gym for health reasons, not to spend three hours a day with a trainer so she can get certain Hollywood roles. She said she does her cardio, some crunches and squats and she's out of there because it's just one part of a real life, not the be-all-and-end-all.
Seems to me this lady is one prety astute cookie and I take my hat off to her. In the light of this, I am disappointed that, as someone mentioned on this forum once, Cathe loses weight before filming. If this was a vicious rumour, then my apologies to Cathe. If it's true, we have to ask: why does she feel the need to do this, and what possible message does this convey to the audience who buys her product?
My words are not intended to offend any one. They come in the light of recent discussion along the themes of: 'will I ever allow myself to be thin?' and 'is 2 hours exercise per day too much?', and posts regarding isues of depression. Is self-esteem (self-acceptance) not at the heart of so much of what gets discussed here?
Clare
If you didn't, you missed a treat. She was on the Diane Rehm show, talking about her new book for children "I'm gonna like me," and about issues regarding self esteem, particularly for women.
She is aiming her message at the parents of young children since apparently problems with self esteem (self acceptance) development start very early.
I was so impressed with the cut-through-the-bullshit attitude of this woman. Having realized that she made a career from her body, that she has made her body worse through unnecessary medical proceedures (nips and tucks, liposuction), she agreed to be on the cover of More magazine (in your standard air-brushed hi glam photo shoot) only if inside the mag they did photos of her her way: head to toe, full body, in her unglam undies with visible saddle bags, spare tire, unmuscled look: i.e. displaying the normal body of a fortysomething woman. She forced More mag to agree to write in the article that it takes 13 people to make a woman 'decent looking enough' for a front cover of a glam mag (i.e. any mag for women), that all those people are needed to do hair, make up, lighting, select a dress, hold it up with safety pins at the back so it actually looks good on her, and then do the post production air brushing.
Jamie lee made the most pertinent point that she will no longer agree to make a living out of selling a lie to women: i.e. as she said on the radio, no-one looks like the faces on the covers of these mags, and that includes the models themselves who serve as canvases. She made the comment that she herself would just love Michelle Pfiffer to get photographed in her undies sans make up, because it would be a realistic image of what a woman her age looks like, that this would mean so much to her, it would do so much for the self-acceptance of women everywhere.
She made the point also that she does go to the gym for health reasons, not to spend three hours a day with a trainer so she can get certain Hollywood roles. She said she does her cardio, some crunches and squats and she's out of there because it's just one part of a real life, not the be-all-and-end-all.
Seems to me this lady is one prety astute cookie and I take my hat off to her. In the light of this, I am disappointed that, as someone mentioned on this forum once, Cathe loses weight before filming. If this was a vicious rumour, then my apologies to Cathe. If it's true, we have to ask: why does she feel the need to do this, and what possible message does this convey to the audience who buys her product?
My words are not intended to offend any one. They come in the light of recent discussion along the themes of: 'will I ever allow myself to be thin?' and 'is 2 hours exercise per day too much?', and posts regarding isues of depression. Is self-esteem (self-acceptance) not at the heart of so much of what gets discussed here?
Clare