Home Depot

lederr

Cathlete
FYI...the Falcons are owned by Arthur Blank who also owns Home Depot. I am going to write a letter to Home Depot telling them that until their owner takes action against the Michael VIck, I will not be shopping there and encouraging others to follow. I will DEFINITELY boycott them for good if Vick is found guilty and does not get fired.

Anyone want to join me?

I think a message needs to be sent to ALL dogfighters that the public will NOT tolerate this cruelty.
 
I think this is a great idea, although I think it is important to remember that,as per the press release yesterday, the NFL has asked(maybe, forbidden?) the Falcons to make any decisions regarding Vick until they are done with their own investigation and discussions. So, for now, Falcon's ownership isn't really in a position to do anything. Just a thought....

ETA: Okay...I just checked. They only asked for them to hold off on decisions. They will be a press conference today.
 
Hey Pippa, I agree that they really can't do anything yet, but it would be good for them to know that there are people that will boycott them should the Falcons choose not to take action.

I live in Atlanta and someone just emailed me to say there have been protests at the Home Depot headquarters. Good. They need to know people are not taking this lightly.
 
I will certainly not be shopping at Home Depot until Vick is fired. I shop at Lowe's anyway. I live very close to the Home Depot HQ so if there are any protests going on, I may just join in. Lorie, when are we going to lunch again??? :)
 
Tess, just got back into town. Start back to work tomorrow...ugh! Can't wait to get together this Sunday!!! :D
 
Hi Lorie - I just posted this on your Vick the *ick thread too. Thanks so much for everything!!! I'm glad to see that Arthur Blank is taking a stand. He seems sickened by all of this, thank goodness! Anyway, here ya go...

I got this from ESPN's website today - good news:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&id=2947725

Falcons distancing themselves from Vick

Updated: July 24, 2007, 7:07 PM ET
Falcons owner Arthur Blank and general manager Rich McKay spoke extensively Tuesday about quarterback Michael Vick, and the tone of the news conference was in past tense.


Though innocent until proven guilty, Vick, the face of the Falcons' franchise, is on the outside looking in. His days as a Falcon appear to be numbered. Blank, McKay and the Falcons are ready to move on while Vick fights his dogfighting case in a federal courtroom in Richmond, Va. Blank drafted the language of a four-game suspension but didn't serve it because commissioner Roger Goodell stepped in and put Vick's status on hold.


For years, Blank and entire Falcons organization stood behind Vick with zeal. Vick was exciting. He filled the Georgia Dome with fans. Blank rewarded him with a $130 million contract extension with a belief that Vick's magic legs and powerful arm could carry the organization to the Super Bowl.


That Blank was willing to suspend him for four games even before Vick registers a plea to his federal indictment was telling. The one-time leader of the Falcons' offense is no longer in a position to lead. He was the toast of Atlanta. Now, he's toast. To regain his standing with the organization, he'll have to fight and defeat these charges and then try to fight his way back on the roster.


Imagine the anger of the owner, flying back from an African vacation, when he learned the details of Vick's indictment. The crime of dogfighting is so disgusting and embarrassing that the front office spent days studying ways to separate itself from Vick instead of embracing him. Blank and McKay studied the concepts of just releasing him. They settled on suspending him.


Blank didn't want to give Vick a paid leave of absence. To potentially pay Vick $6 million and then learn he is guilty didn't work for an owner who has pride in the businesses he owns. If anything, the Falcons might look to reclaim some of the money he's been paid.


Understand that the decision by Goodell to order Vick out of camp was a compromise mutually worked out between the NFLPA, the league and the Falcons. The Falcons decided to keep him off the field as long as they could. Rules mandate team suspensions can't be longer than four games. Blank wanted the max.


The three parties worked all day Monday to come up with what everyone thought could be an acceptable solution. Credit Goodell with a save in some regards, but what he can't patch is the icy relationship Vick now has with the Falcons. It is likely Goodell will let a good portion of the training camp pass before he lets Vick return.


Anyone thinking Vick will be part of the Falcons this year is living in a fantasy world. It's possible, but odds are building against it. First, he has to clear his name from the dogfighting rap. It's Joey Harrington's team temporarily. Vick remains part of the team, but he's on his own for the time being. John Clayton is a senior writer for ESPN.com.

Suz

"Until one has loved an animal, a part of one's soul remains unawakened." - Anatole France

http://www.picturetrail.com/dogs2birds
 
I would ask that people not boycott Home Depot over Vick. The NFL has banned him from camp. He is being investigated by the team and the League. Currently that's all that can be done legally.

Home Depot has done a lot for the communities it's in and has been acknowledged for it's overwhelming support for veterans and veteran organizations. I understand it also still pays the employees that are deployed reservists while they are serving the country.

Vick will get what's coming to him.
 
>I would ask that people not boycott Home Depot over Vick.
>The NFL has banned him from camp. He is being investigated by
>the team and the League. Currently that's all that can be
>done legally.
>
>Home Depot has done a lot for the communities it's in and has
>been acknowledged for it's overwhelming support for veterans
>and veteran organizations. I understand it also still pays
>the employees that are deployed reservists while they are
>serving the country.
>
>Vick will get what's coming to him.

Dave, I completely agree with you on this one. I won't be boycotting HD anytime soon.
 
I don't like HD anyway so I won't boycott. I will boycott the Falcons if something isn't done to Vick!
Ellen
 
RE: let the flames begin

Ok - I've been reading these Vick posts with interest - and I've read the indictment. Gruesome and heinous. If these are true as stated and properly investigated and properly established in court, I'm sure a jury will convict (if he doesn't plead first, doubtful) and then I certainly hope that all people affiliated with him take the morally right steps by severing ties and sending the message that this activity will never be tolerated. (WOW that was a run-on sentence)

BUT - I do have this teeny tiny problem with this thing called the Constitution which gives EVERYONE a presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I was a prosecutor for 10 years and my DH does death penalty defense work, so please believe me when I say I've seen some of the worst there can be. But I know if it were my husband or brother or father or sister or me or whoever, scummy as the allegations may be, I would hope that the process would be allowed to work before the judments are passed. I know that in the real society we judge based on what the media gives us, but I've got to try to keep believing our due process system is the best and should be followed. Ok - sorry to differ - and I know the flames will come, but I had to say this. Have a great day everyone.

Lorrie

www.picturetrail.com/lsass

3 days, 60 miles, 1 cure. Check out my webpage:
http://www.the3day.org/cleveland07/lorriesassbenza808
 
RE: let the flames begin

I actually just read a great Sports Illustrated article that talked about how all of the pressure the public has put on the NFL is what has led them to suspend Vick from training camp and possibly(hopefully!) for the year. Keep it up!

Trials, etc. can take a long time and I would hate to think of him getting to just live his life and enjoy his lifestyle while we wait for a trial to drag on. And, like others have said, most people indicted on federal criminal charges would be *asked* to take a leave of absence from their jobs. I don't think he is somehow getting worse treatment for being a sports celebrity. JMO
 
RE: let the flames begin

I was just reading a news article online where it was being claimed that Vick just doesn't get the seriousness of these allegations and doesn't understand why this should affect his status! Supposedly stated by someone who knows him and is familiar with his case. Yes there is no question of "presumed innocence" but obviously there is some evidence supporting his indictment. There are plenty of people who are suspended with pay awaiting the outcome of a trial. That should also apply to Vick. I hope we all keep the pressure on the NFL and the Falcons. I really believe without this pressure they would have tried to gloss over this to protect their investment. Now I can add HD to my list of places to avoid.
 
RE: let the flames begin

Why boycott Home Depot? The owner of the Falcons is doing everything he legally can to keep Vick from playing. He has to work with the NFL with this. Do you think he really wants his star player suspended WITH pay - the highest paid quarterback in the league, by the way - higher than Tom Brady or Peyton Manning - for ANY of the season? I think we have to be careful with boycotts and such - let's make sure we're boycotting for the right reason. Now Nike - they should pull ALL Vick-wear off the shelves until the outcome is clear.

And whether Vick thinks this is serious or not - anyone who would injure an animal for sport is a low down piece of scum. What his opinion is on this, means less than nothing. And while I'm all for due-process and innocent until proven guilty - the evidence is fairly overwhelming.
 
RE: let the flames begin

>BUT - I do have this teeny tiny problem with this thing called
>the Constitution which gives EVERYONE a presumption of
>innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I was
>a prosecutor for 10 years and my DH does death penalty defense
>work, so please believe me when I say I've seen some of the
>worst there can be. But I know if it were my husband or
>brother or father or sister or me or whoever, scummy as the
>allegations may be, I would hope that the process would be
>allowed to work before the judments are passed. I know that
>in the real society we judge based on what the media gives us,
>but I've got to try to keep believing our due process system
>is the best and should be followed. Ok - sorry to differ -
>and I know the flames will come, but I had to say this. Have
>a great day everyone.

I am with you, Lorrie.
 
RE: let the flames begin

I'm with Lorrie and Christine. Now mind you, if he's proven guilty I'd be in favor of executing the same sentence he gave those dogs, but let's give the process a chance to work. Two words -- Duke Lacrosse.
 
RE: let the flames begin

I already posted a lengthy argument as to why I think this is NOTHING like the Duke lacrosse case so I won't repeat it here. I'll only reiterate that a HUGE difference between these two cases is that, unfortunately, the victims in this case didn't get to press their own charges and are also incapable of deceipt and manipulation(although my doggy does seem to be able to get me to do anything he wants :) )Something that was a huge part of the Duke lacrosse mess.
 
RE: let the flames begin

>the victims in this case didn't
>get to press their own charges and are also incapable of
>deceipt and manipulation

Obviously you've never had a wiener dog -- ROTFLMAO!!

I can understand your point but I still think we need to follow the system that we have in place. Please don't misunderstand my position -- I'm completely in favor of swift and severe punishment for animal abuse.
 

Our Newsletter

Get awesome content delivered straight to your inbox.

Top