kimroberts
Cathlete
I purchase some Energy Bars off the Web. I got hooked on them at the gym and the owner quit carrying chocolate, my favorite flavor. So I buy them myself now. In my recent shipment, the labeling had changed but the bar looked/tasted the same. The difference? THE CALORIE CONTENT HAD GONE UP TO 400 CALORIES A BAR WHEN IT USED TO BE 270 CALORIES.
So I immediately fired off an email to the company and said, "What's up with this change?"
Come to find out, glycerin, the sweetner in this product and many other diet products, did not have to be listed in the calorie content because it is an alcohol, rather than a fat/protein/carb. So the bar has ALWAYS had 400 calories in it, even though it used to appear as if it only had 270. I don't know enough about this info to understand it completely. Maybe someone else can enlighten me.
Here's the general info from this guy's email:
He didn't say when, but the FDA has required that companies list the glycerin in the calorie content or pay a fine. The email I got back from the company I purchased from said that other companies opted to pay the fines rather than change their labeling, so they could still be deceiving. He listed 3 major manufacturers, and if you eat any meal replacement stuff, you've probably eaten one of them. I'd rather not put the manufacturer names he gave me on here because I don't have any newspaper clippings or such to back him up. But according to this guy, one company opted to pay a $32 million fine rather than re-lable their product, and another company opted to pay $6.2 million. Both companies seemed to think they would lose less money by paying the fine rather than re-labeling the product and losing sales.
I guess "buyer beware" takes on a whole new meaning. Read those labels closely and if you're in doubt and calories matter a lot to you, it's worth an email to the manufacturer to check it out.
So I immediately fired off an email to the company and said, "What's up with this change?"
Come to find out, glycerin, the sweetner in this product and many other diet products, did not have to be listed in the calorie content because it is an alcohol, rather than a fat/protein/carb. So the bar has ALWAYS had 400 calories in it, even though it used to appear as if it only had 270. I don't know enough about this info to understand it completely. Maybe someone else can enlighten me.
Here's the general info from this guy's email:
He didn't say when, but the FDA has required that companies list the glycerin in the calorie content or pay a fine. The email I got back from the company I purchased from said that other companies opted to pay the fines rather than change their labeling, so they could still be deceiving. He listed 3 major manufacturers, and if you eat any meal replacement stuff, you've probably eaten one of them. I'd rather not put the manufacturer names he gave me on here because I don't have any newspaper clippings or such to back him up. But according to this guy, one company opted to pay a $32 million fine rather than re-lable their product, and another company opted to pay $6.2 million. Both companies seemed to think they would lose less money by paying the fine rather than re-labeling the product and losing sales.
I guess "buyer beware" takes on a whole new meaning. Read those labels closely and if you're in doubt and calories matter a lot to you, it's worth an email to the manufacturer to check it out.