Aquajock
Cathlete
I just read on the CNN.com website that one of the most avid and vicious of the Manson Family murderers, Susan Atkins, is dying of brain cancer at age 60 and has requested a compassionate release from the California prison system given that she has approximately 6 months to live according to her doctors.
With the total understanding that my opinion has precisely zero impact on this case in particular or the world in general, I'm really on the fence about this one. Atkins, the record shows, participated in slaughtering five people (including young, pregnant Sharon Tate and four others) one night, then a middle-aged couple the next night, in 1969. She even told poor Tate, who begged for mercy for herself and her unborn child, "B*tch, I have no mercy for you." And, after a lengthy, painful and expensive trial, she and her compatriots, and Charles Manson, were all found guilty, initially sentenced to the death penalty and then later to life imprisonment when California (long-term-temporarily) abandoned the death penalty. And now . . . she asks for mercy for herself.
What is justice here? Should life imprisonment be indeed life (and death) imprisonment regardless of how one has served out her sentence? According to her, she has become a born-again Christian and has worked with at-risk youth during her incarceration. It is doubtful she poses a threat to society now. It is probable that her remaining incarceration would be quite expensive given her medical condition and needs.
An argument could also be made that, if ANYONE deserves to die in prison because of the heinousness of his/her crimes, it would be Atkins and Manson, and the others directly involved in the mass killings. If Atkins's request is approved, how many other requests might follow?
I'm interested in others' opinions on this one. Thanks for reading, and your responses.
A-Jock
With the total understanding that my opinion has precisely zero impact on this case in particular or the world in general, I'm really on the fence about this one. Atkins, the record shows, participated in slaughtering five people (including young, pregnant Sharon Tate and four others) one night, then a middle-aged couple the next night, in 1969. She even told poor Tate, who begged for mercy for herself and her unborn child, "B*tch, I have no mercy for you." And, after a lengthy, painful and expensive trial, she and her compatriots, and Charles Manson, were all found guilty, initially sentenced to the death penalty and then later to life imprisonment when California (long-term-temporarily) abandoned the death penalty. And now . . . she asks for mercy for herself.
What is justice here? Should life imprisonment be indeed life (and death) imprisonment regardless of how one has served out her sentence? According to her, she has become a born-again Christian and has worked with at-risk youth during her incarceration. It is doubtful she poses a threat to society now. It is probable that her remaining incarceration would be quite expensive given her medical condition and needs.
An argument could also be made that, if ANYONE deserves to die in prison because of the heinousness of his/her crimes, it would be Atkins and Manson, and the others directly involved in the mass killings. If Atkins's request is approved, how many other requests might follow?
I'm interested in others' opinions on this one. Thanks for reading, and your responses.
A-Jock