50-year-old (or older) views on clean eating

SRP

Cathlete
I'm reading "The Good Life" by Helen and Scott Nearing. This book documents the couple's homesteading experiences in detail. They moved from New York City to rural New Hampshire back in the 1930s and homesteaded for 60 years. This book was first written in 1954, so you can see how old it is.

Anyhow, they have a chapter on the food they ate - almost all of it grown by them - as well as their opinions on a healthy diet. It's really quite interesting. I hope you don't mind a long post.... The rest of this will be quoted directly from the book - Chapter 5: Eating for Health.

"Good food should be grown on whole soil, be eaten whole, unprocessed and garden fresh. Even the best products of the best soils lose more or less of their nutritive value if they are processed. Any modification at all is likely to reduce the nutritive value of whole food."

"The foods we chose to live on were those that had the simplest, closest and most natural relationship to the soil. Jared Eliot (an author cited in the book) called them 'the clean productions of the earth.' All foods, animal as well as vegetable, come from the land, but raw fruits, nuts and vegetables are the simplest, come most directly and in the closest connection... We might call them primary foods."

"Dairy products are foods at second or third-hand, reaching humans through the bodies of animals which feed on the produce of the soil. ... Milk is a highly concentrated infant food, especially designed to stimulate rapid growth in the early stages of development... Food intended by nature for one is not necessarily a desirable food for the other. Adults of any breed should have been weaned and past the milk stage of feeding."

"Humans eat another type of food which is the furthest removed from the soil - the cooked carcasses of beasts, birds and fish. The human practice of eating the dead bodies of fellow creatures has gone on for so long that it is regarded generally as normal. ... Before the blood culture (how they describe eating meat), which began with the domestication of animals, there was a tree culture based on a diet of fruit, nuts, seeds, shoots and roots."

Okay - I'll stop typing now. That's only a few brief excerpts from the chapter. I found it interesting that the concept of clean eating (note that they do use that term) goes so far back. Of course, their views differ from some of those here. Still, it was a very interesting chapter to read!
 
I saw Helen Nearing 16 years ago, soon after Scott's death. She spoke at a vegetarian conference I went to and was in her 80's at the time, I believe. She talked about how Scott died: he basically decided he'd lived a long and productive life, and instead of wasting away (he was in his 90's), decided to go out his own way, and decided to fast until his body gave out.
 
Kathryn - that's pretty cool. How interesting it must have been to see her! It says in the preface to the book, written by Helen, that Scott lived to be 100. I'd say that's an excellent testimonial to a life of exercise and healthy eating!
 
> It says in the preface to the book, written
>by Helen, that Scott lived to be 100. I'd say that's an
>excellent testimonial to a life of exercise and healthy
>eating!

Especially since it sounded like he could have gone on longer, but he decided not to (and I'm not sure if we're designed to go much beyond 100!)
 
I think you're right. I work at a hospital, where the research portion of the Department of Geriatrics concentrates on stuff that will expand people's life expectancy. They're all looking for the fountain of youth, some magic something that will let people live forever. It bugs the heck out of me that they just can't accept that everything must die in order for life to continue.
 

Our Newsletter

Get awesome content delivered straight to your inbox.

Top