LauraMax
Cathlete
I'm just about done. I just got to my very favorite part of the story--where Scarlett finally does something smart re. her love life & marries Rhett. I just love the way he spoils her rotten!
Even though she's still a moron about the fact that she loves him & can't admit it.
Anyway, I was thinking about the comment someone (jodijodi I think?) made about how Mitchell portrayed AAs after the war. Yep, she makes them seem stupid, childlike, irresponsible & lazy (which makes me wonder--actually I've always wondered--what were the elected blacks like at the time? Were they really just tools of the Freedman's Bureau? Or were they smart, competent politicians? Doesn't seem like there's been much research on this, but I'm getting off track..........).
So, some of the things Mitchell wrote kind of took me aback. When she criticized Wilkerson & others in the FB for telling blacks they were equal to whites & the like as if this was a BAD THING........it occurred to me that Wilkerson would likely be the protagonist if it was written in the 21st c.
I had this vision of a book where there was a grand romance betw. Wilkerson & Emmie Slattery, who were held down by the plantation elite. Wilkerson worked w/slaves & respected them b/c he realized they were people, just like whites. Wilkerson only stole from the O'Haras b/c the love of his life was sick & starving & he wanted to help her. Wilkerson & Emmie finally have the opportunity to make something of their lives after the war. In the meantime, the wealthy elitist human-being owners finally get what's coming to them when slaves are freed. Wilkerson promptly goes to work for the FB b/c he sincerely wants to help the freed slaves.
We've had "sequels" & "prequels" to GWTW. Wouldn't this make a cool book?
Anyway, I was thinking about the comment someone (jodijodi I think?) made about how Mitchell portrayed AAs after the war. Yep, she makes them seem stupid, childlike, irresponsible & lazy (which makes me wonder--actually I've always wondered--what were the elected blacks like at the time? Were they really just tools of the Freedman's Bureau? Or were they smart, competent politicians? Doesn't seem like there's been much research on this, but I'm getting off track..........).
So, some of the things Mitchell wrote kind of took me aback. When she criticized Wilkerson & others in the FB for telling blacks they were equal to whites & the like as if this was a BAD THING........it occurred to me that Wilkerson would likely be the protagonist if it was written in the 21st c.
I had this vision of a book where there was a grand romance betw. Wilkerson & Emmie Slattery, who were held down by the plantation elite. Wilkerson worked w/slaves & respected them b/c he realized they were people, just like whites. Wilkerson only stole from the O'Haras b/c the love of his life was sick & starving & he wanted to help her. Wilkerson & Emmie finally have the opportunity to make something of their lives after the war. In the meantime, the wealthy elitist human-being owners finally get what's coming to them when slaves are freed. Wilkerson promptly goes to work for the FB b/c he sincerely wants to help the freed slaves.
We've had "sequels" & "prequels" to GWTW. Wouldn't this make a cool book?


