>Please know that I am not trying to tell you or anyone how to
>care for your child. I am ahppy the moms here who placed
>their babies on their tummies did so without incident. BUT,
>this does not change the evidence that finds this practice
>increases the risk of SIDS. It is important to remember that
>infants sleeping on their tummies (until they can roll over)
>are placed at an increased risk of SIDS. This is not the same
>as stating that every child sleeping on their tummy will
>suffer SIDS. It is also important to remember that being in
>the same room, especially sleeping, does not lessen the risk.
>You would have to be watching the child the entire time they
>were sleeping.
>
>I think all of us can counter any claim that a particular
>activity increases our risk of injury. For example, the
>smoker who lives to be 90 and dies of old age versus the
>non-smoker who develops lung cancer. The fact that not all
>smokers die from lung cancer does not disprove the fact that
>it increases a person risk.
>
>Ok, I am leaving the lecture podium.
>
>Autumn
>
>
I just want to second Autumn's sentiments about what we can infer from scientific evidence because what she says is so important and she shouldn't hestitate to share her expertise. You can find examples of anything--my parents didn't put US in car seats and WE survived. My mother never took folic acid and I turned out ok. But that doesn't mean that the data on car seat use improving safety or folic acid reducing birth defects is faulty. The best evidence comes from large scale studies with lots of people, not an individual's (or even several individuals') luck dodging a bullet. Sorry if I sound preachy, but I think this is an important point to keep in mind just about interpreting SIDS risk, but lots of health and safety info we receive.