goldenpath
Cathlete
In your opinion what was the better workout:
Workout #1
Duration: 37 min.
Calories: 314
Body Fat: 50%
Time in Zone: 12.16
Workout #2
Duration: 48 min.
Calories: 492
Body Fat: 35%
Time in Zone: 10
I am a bit confused what I should be looking at to improve my workouts. The Calories burned in the second workout are much more BUT the fat % is much more in the first workout. How could that be and why? Also how important is it to stay in your zone? The first workout I was up and down but the second workout I was mostly above my zone. Is this good or bad?
Thank you for any insight you may give me as to how to get the most out of my workouts.
Workout #1
Duration: 37 min.
Calories: 314
Body Fat: 50%
Time in Zone: 12.16
Workout #2
Duration: 48 min.
Calories: 492
Body Fat: 35%
Time in Zone: 10
I am a bit confused what I should be looking at to improve my workouts. The Calories burned in the second workout are much more BUT the fat % is much more in the first workout. How could that be and why? Also how important is it to stay in your zone? The first workout I was up and down but the second workout I was mostly above my zone. Is this good or bad?
Thank you for any insight you may give me as to how to get the most out of my workouts.